Re: IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep

"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I think I am lost.  (which also suggests that the wordings need to be
improved)
Please clarify two simple things:
a. Are mixed RTL and LTR characters allowed within a label?
b. If there are more categories than R, AL and L that we are discussing,
then in point 3 it should not say "As defined above":

-----
2) If a string contains any Right-to-Left character (defined as
belonging to Unicode bidirectional categories "R" and "AL"), the string
MUST NOT contain any Left-to-Right character (defined as belonging to
Unicode bidirectional category "L").

3)  If a string contains any Right-to-Left character (as defined above),
a Right-to-Left character MUST be the first character of the string, and
a Right-to-Left character MUST be the last character of the string.
-----

Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call on two major changes to Stringprep


> At 7:37 AM -0400 7/8/02, Edmon Chung wrote:
> >I dont quite understand why we need to have 3.
> >Isnt 3 a subset of 2?
>
> No. There are many categories, not just R, AL, and L, as detailed in
> the Unicode standard.
>
> >. . . Why would both be displayed the same?
>
> Read the Unicode standard for information on this.
>
> >Furthermore, the section for bidi in Nameprep should be updated to
specify
> >that it is meant to say within a label there cannot be both RTL and LTR
> >characters
>
> That's not true.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.