Re: Re: Document Status?

"Soobok Lee" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idn
Message-ID <004901c25242$d16d8510$0101010a@temp>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "YangWoo Ko" <[email protected]>
To: "IETF idn working group" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: Document Status?


> Dear all,
>    
> Why should IETF WG handle implementation issues of specific OS/GUI ?   
> What about just let others handle them ?

Implementation specifics and implementability issues are different. The latter 
one may be one of architectural/security issues which we should discuss on.

>   
> Is it possible to remove every application-related features out of IDNA
> document except IDN being ACE encoded somewhere and somehow outside of
> DNS ? Does it help or harm ?

If you begin to remove those features, only Punycode draft  will remain in the pool.
IDN is not only a problem of DNS server/client, but also problems around applications
which uses domain names as *local* identifiers and do comparisons on them.

Soobok Lee

>   
> Regards
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.