Re: Document Status?
"Edmon Chung" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ok, let me make it really clear. In my opinion this is where I see us
heading:
1. the standard being IDNA (MIME like approach)
2. transition strategies that takes into consideration immediate user
experience will be deployed by responsible registries for their users
- these may be and are most likely 8bit+ solutions
- and takes the query sent by existing applications and resolves it
correctly
I am saying that my work on TRACE-01 is transitional. Yes maybe it will be
used for a decade and more, but it is meant to be an informational document
on how to get from where we are now towards IDNA, however long it may take.
Edmon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <[email protected]>
To: "Edmon Chung" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status?
> At 01:59 PM 9/3/2002 -0400, Edmon Chung wrote:
> >I am just saying that it is important to make clear what the "standard"
is
> >and what the "transition" might look like.
>
> A standard is what we are specifying now and what will be used now.
>
> Anything for the future is just that. For the future.
>
> Having a discussion about possible transition issues and targets is fine,
> but it is not fine to deprecate the current work as "merely" transitional.
>
> Something that is going to be used for more than a decade is more than
> transitional.
>
> d/
>
> ----------
> Dave Crocker <mailto:[email protected]>
> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
>
>
>