Re: Editorial comments on stringprep
"Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In the midst of some very well-thought-out comments, Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> wrote: > Section 3.2 talks about the tradition of using lowercase > but my understanding is also that there is a technical argument > in that downcasing is more well-defined in Unicode than upcasing. > Is this not the case? If so if would make sense to add that to > the description of the motivation. I can't think of anything that would lead to that impression, in Unicode or anywhere else. Uppercase, lowercase, and titlecase mapping are all handled on a completely equal footing in Unicode. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California