Re: Figuring out what can be displayed

Erik Nordmark <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > 3) ACE labels obtained from domain name slots SHOULD be hidden from
> > users when it is known that the environment can handle the non-ACE
> > form, except when the ACE form is explicitly requested.
> 
> I'd prefer to retain the "problems" escape hatch:
> 
>     3) ACE labels obtained from domain name slots SHOULD be hidden from
>     users when it is known that the non-ACE form can be handled by the
>     environment and will not cause problems, unless the ACE form is
>     explicitly requested.

OK.

> > When it is not known whether the environment can handle the non-ACE
> > form, the application MAY use the non-ACE form (which might fail e.g.
> > by not being displayed propertly) or it MAY instead use the ACE form
> > (which will look unintelligle to the user).
> 
> We are in a section called "Requirements", but this is not a
> requirement, it's just the opposite.  I don't think it's necessary
> at all (because the application obviously MAY do anything that's not
> forbidden), but if you want something like this, I think it belongs in
> section 6.1 and/or 6.4.

I think the dual "MAY"s make it clear that the specification
doesn't require or recommend either. This could of course be done
without using the upper case MAYs, but I think it would be a bad
idea to move this statement of non-requirement away from the very closely
related "SHOULD" requirement, since that will make it much harder
for the reader to piece together the complete picture here.

  Erik
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.