Re: length restrictions on IDN label

Soobok Lee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:

>>The restriction orginated from RFC1035 affects all  label 
>>creation/validations.
>>And "octet(ToASCII(X)) <= 63" seems to loosen the restrictions about
>>8bit labels. That is why i think RFC1035 restriction is about to be 
>>obsoleted.
>>    
>>
>
>	There is nothing new with the number of octets in presentation
>	form being greater those presented on the wire.  In RFC
>	1034 0x00 is presented as "\000", 0x5c as "\\" or  "\093",
>	0x2e as "\." or "\046".
>
UTF8-form of a label may be used as protocol elements , in addition to
presentation forms.
In the latter case, there will be no problem as you said above: just
display it.

But, in the former case of being used as protocols elements, utf8-form
label length limit is
of our concern. IDNA drafts does not rule out that utf-8 form of labels
may be used as protocol
elements. This will clairfy my point.

Thanks.

Soobok Lee
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.