Re: IDNA problem statement

Oops:

> I still don't see the point of this passage.  It sounds as though some
> other standards organization would be better equipped to develop a
> character set than SC 2/WG 1 or UTC, but we're going with Unicode
> anyway, just for the sake of expediency.  Is that the intent?  If not,
> what purpose does the "which" clause serve?

SC 2/WG 2

-Doug Ewell
 Fullerton, California