Re: Re: Fwd: Unicode letter ballot

Soobok Lee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:39:57AM +0100, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> Soobok Lee <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > If option A wins, I see a chaos:
> 
> I don't see chaos. Since these are compatibility characters, they
> won't be part of any registered domain. Users of domains that contain
> the compatibility equivalents of these characters should simply use
> those equivalents in their HTML pages.

Right, if the html page use NFCed UTF8 as basic encoding.

But, Most homepages in east asia use local charset /encoding. And
that requires localcharset<->unicode conversion that produces
compatibility CJKs which will be further fed into nameprep.
Korean IME produces compatiblity-CJK-equivalent KSX characters in
interactive input session on the url bar in browsers.

Soobok Lee

> 
> Notice that this "problem" already exists for Unicode 3.2.0, and
> U+F951:

Yes. This issue is not new problem. We had already discussed . And
concluded it is not a big problem. but, this instance of 5 chars
seems to need serious decision that we had not expected, iMO.
the pure possiblity become the reality.

Soobok lee

> 
> http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NormalizationCorrections.txt
> 
> Regards,
> Martin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.