Re: Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]
Lizhenbin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934B9674@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com> |
Support the adoption of the two drafts as the co-author. I think Path Segment is a base work for many applications such as SR OAM, bidirectional SR path and protection. BGP extensions for the path segment will facilitate the automated solution and reduce the complexity of deployment. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:35 AM To: 'idr wg' <[email protected]> Subject: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019] This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019] * draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and * draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. You can access these two drafts at the following location: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/ The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this draft since the following SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 Please consider the following questions in your responses? 1) Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback to spring about putting this technology in BGP. 2) Is this technology a good way to implement the required Features in BGP? 3) Is this technology ready for adoption? 4) Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? Cheers, Susan Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr