答复: Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp -ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-l i-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1 /2019]
"Aijun Wang" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, All: Support the adoption. One comments: Can these two drafts be merged into one? Most of the their contents are overlapped. Add simply the corresponding part for “BGP-LS protocol extension” in “draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt”may be more easily for future advancing and the user reading. Best Regards. Aijun Wang China Telecom 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Susan Hares 发送时间: 2019年9月18日 0:35 收件人: 'idr wg' 主题: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019] This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019] ・ draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and ・ draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. You can access these two drafts at the following location: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/ The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this draft since the following SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 Please consider the following questions in your responses? 1) Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback to spring about putting this technology in BGP. 2) Is this technology a good way to implement the required Features in BGP? 3) Is this technology ready for adoption? 4) Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? Cheers, Susan Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr