Re: [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback requested

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi \(Fed\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idr
Message-ID <BL0PR0901MB4563CAC8A4A53FF2D21EB81A84810__11054.5110817597$1569592739$gmane$org@BL0PR0901MB4563.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Warren,

Thanks for the additional data/suggestions. Comments below.

......
>> Some recent measurements we have at NIST about this are as follow:
>> (thanks to Lilia Hannachi - my colleague)
>>
>
>This is nice, but what would make it more useful would be if it also
>reported if there are *useful* AS_SETS / if the AS_SET means anything.
>
>For example, from Jared's email below:
>AS path:  14061 3356 6762 23487 27738 27738 27738 27738 27738 27738
>{27738} -- the 27738 AS already shows up as a non-AS_SET in the path.
>
>I've also seen a number of instances where the AS_SET contains many
>repeated instances, e.g:
>AS path: 6939 3356 42020 39010 {39275 39275 39275 39275 39275 39275
>39275 39275 39275 39275} -- this doesn't seem to actually mean
>anything...
>
>Looking at the top few AS paths with AS_SETs I see:
>  28 12127
>  27 27738
>  24 11139
>  17 23383
>  13 12849
>
>AS12127 - Telefonica Moviles El Salvador S.A. de C.V., SV (these are
>all behind AS263783 - Telefonica Moviles El Salvador S.A. de C.V., SV
>)
>AS27738 - Ecuadortelecom S.A., EC
>AS11139 - CWC-ROC-11139 - Cable & Wireless Dominica, DM
>AS23383 - METRORED S.A. DE C.V., HN   (this also seems to provide
>transit to AS267737? (advertising 45.168.172.0/24))
>AS12849 HOTNET-IL AMS-IX Admin LAN, IL
.....

Interesting! We can extend our analysis at NIST to examine these things as needed.
In the data that I shared earlier, another thing you might have noticed
is that there are ~ 350 instances where special purpose ASNs occur in AS_SETs.
An earlier study we did and presented at IETF is here:
https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/itl/antd/AS_SET_Aggregator_Stats-2.pdf  
There we noticed other strange things:
In some cases, AS in the AGGREGATOR doesn't match the right most AS in the AS_PATH
that follows the AS_SET. So AGGREGATOR is different from the AS that created the AS_SET! Hmm..! 
In the slides, we also reported numbers on private ASNs seen in AS_SETs.

Sriram  
  

 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.