Re: Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]
Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5CF7206@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com> |
I have read through both drafts. And I support the WG adoption of them. Best Regards, Shunwan From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:35 AM To: 'idr wg' <[email protected]> Subject: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019] This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019] * draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and * draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. You can access these two drafts at the following location: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/ The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this draft since the following SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 Please consider the following questions in your responses? 1) Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback to spring about putting this technology in BGP. 2) Is this technology a good way to implement the required Features in BGP? 3) Is this technology ready for adoption? 4) Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? Cheers, Susan Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr