Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-09.txt
Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Donald, On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:37:08AM -0400, Donald Eastlake wrote: > I also agree the different kinds of flowspec should be kept separate. In my opinion, as a learning from our 5575bis work, new flowspec should honestly be deferred for flowspec v2 encoding. Otherwise, we're likely to have implementations ignoring the NLRI and/or possibly dropping BGP sessions. Certainly figuring out what afi/safi the l2 flowspec encaps should use is a continuing discussion as well. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr