Re: Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

stefano previdi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I support the adoption of both drafts.

thanks.
s.


> On Sep 17, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019] 
> ·         draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and 
> ·         draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. 
>  
> You can access these two drafts at the following location: 
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/
>  
> The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this 
> draft since the following  SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: 
>  
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00
>  
> Please consider the following questions in your responses? 
>  
> 1)      Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS 
>  
> Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback 
> to spring about putting this technology in BGP.
>  
> 2)      Is this technology a good way to implement the required 
> Features in BGP? 
>  
> 3)      Is this technology ready for adoption? 
>  
> 4)      Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? 
>  
>  
> Cheers, Susan Hares 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.