Re: Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]
stefano previdi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I support the adoption of both drafts. thanks. s. > On Sep 17, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019] > · draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and > · draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. > > You can access these two drafts at the following location: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/ > > The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this > draft since the following SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 > > Please consider the following questions in your responses? > > 1) Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS > > Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback > to spring about putting this technology in BGP. > > 2) Is this technology a good way to implement the required > Features in BGP? > > 3) Is this technology ready for adoption? > > 4) Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? > > > Cheers, Susan Hares > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr