答复: draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd- 05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/201 9)

Hi,

I think this draft provides a very good way to distribute routing policies. In particular, when routing policy is already exist in the live network configuration, the traditional method is very easy to bring wrong and unnecessary impacts, the approach in this draft could well avoid this situation. Thus I support the adoption of this document.

Best Wishes

Wen

发件人: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Dongjie (Jimmy)
发送时间: 2019年10月26日 14:40
收件人: Susan Hares <[email protected]>; 'idr wg' <[email protected]>
主题: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

Hi,

I’ve read the latest version of this draft and think it is a good starting point for the distribution of routing policies using BGP. Thus I support the adoption of this document.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 3:19 AM
To: 'idr wg' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt
(10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/

In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:


1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,

2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound mechanism,

3)      A deployment need exists for this technology.


Susan Hares
Co-chair and shepherd

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr