Re: draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

 
As far as I understand this document, it specifies an extension to the BGP protocol to offer better traffic engineering.

By introducing a new SAFI and wide community to distribute policies, the very mechanism could be implemented and controlled in a given bailiwick.

I am in support of this draft adopted as a WG item.

Di

> 在 2019年10月15日，03:18，Susan Hares <[email protected]> 写道：
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt
> (10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at: 
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/
>  
> In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:
>  
> 1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,
> 2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound mechanism,
> 3)      A deployment need exists for this technology.
>  
>  
> Susan Hares
> Co-chair and shepherd 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr