Re: draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

Support as the co-author. We have a long-term discussion with the operators including China Telecom, Tencent, etc. and
several experimental implementations on the traffic steering solutions. In the process we believe BGP-based solutions have
much advantages in scalability, performance, etc. At the same time thanks for advice from the community the design of BGP
extensions are refined well. I think it is the right time for the WG adoption.


Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 3:19 AM
To: 'idr wg' <[email protected]>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt
(10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/

In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:


1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,

2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound mechanism,

3)      A deployment need exists for this technology.


Susan Hares
Co-chair and shepherd

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr