Re: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)
Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:31:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sue, Support as co-author. Hopefully 2 implementations that suddenly disappeared, will eventually show up. From the process prospective however - we have got 2 interoperating implementations and can proceed regardless of the above. Cheers, Jeff > On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:26, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt. > > The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki: > > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations > > The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point. The current web page leaves some doubt. > > Cheerily, Susan Hares > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr