Re: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)

Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> Sat, 2 Nov 2019 18:31:55 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Sue,

Support as co-author.
Hopefully 2 implementations that suddenly disappeared, will eventually show up.
From the process prospective however - we have got 2 interoperating  implementations and can proceed regardless of the above. 

Cheers,
Jeff

> On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:26, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt.
>  
> The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:
>  
>  https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations
>  
> The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt.
>  
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr