Re: WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]

Support.
The same policy has been used in IS-IS for years and works well.

   Les

From: Idr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2019 6:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]

Greetings IDR:

The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt
was inconclusive.  We had clear support, but just not enough response.
This is a second WG adoption call.

This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752
"Border Gateway Protocol – Link   State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry"
from Designated Expert to  Expert Review.

These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of
code point or code points in the registry.
The only difference is instructions for the review.

Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the
BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.

John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for
BGP-LS quicker response to code requests.  We encourage the WG to
read and strongly consider this draft.

Cheerily, Sue

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr