Re: WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]
Lizhenbin <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:56:55 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Support the adoption. Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) -------------------------------------------------- 李振斌 Li Zhenbin Mobile: +86-13651017745<tel:+86-13651017745>/+968-91797068<tel:+968-91797068> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 发件人:Susan Hares <[email protected]> 收件人:idr <[email protected]> 时 间:2019-11-04 03:08:57 主题[Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019] Greetings IDR: The adoption call for draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt was inconclusive. We had clear support, but just not enough response. This lack of response was probably due to my errors in posting the name of the draft (pardon my error Adrian) [Blush..] To make this easier, the current draft is: draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03/ which you can get at; https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry/ This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752 "Border Gateway Protocol – Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry" from Designated Expert to Expert Review. These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of code point or code points in the registry. The only difference is instructions for the review. Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments. John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for BGP-LS quicker response to code requests. We encourage the WG to read and strongly consider this draft. Cheers, Sue _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr