Re: WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]

> I support adoption and propose simultaneous WGLC.
> 
> The document is straight forward and needed work.

+1
There are times when we should be able to "just get it done".
This is one such time.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 12:53 PM
> To: Susan Hares <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-
> registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]
> 
> Sue,
> 
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 02:08:12PM -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
> > The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt  was
> > inconclusive.
> >
> > We had clear support, but just not enough response.
> > This lack of response was probably due to my errors in posting the
> > name of the draft (pardon my error Adrian) [Blush..]
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the
> > BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.
> 
> I support adoption and propose simultaneous WGLC.
> 
> The document is straight forward and needed work.
> 
> -- Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr