Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-02.txt

> On Nov 10, 2019, at 12:01 AM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Alejandro,
> Sander,
> 
> [Alejandro]
>>> As a comment, we did a small research and 
>>> these are our findings (hope the table shows ok):
>>> .....snip.....
> 
> [Sander]
>> Those numbers are very manageable. If we gather a couple 
>> of volunteers we could personally contact each AS.
> 
> Thanks for the measurement numbers and your comments.
> 
> We had earlier reported similar numbers (totals across all RIR regions)
> with many more details:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tE8o0HZeLLUEulMkszVBlxqILeU
> 
> The link to our detailed data is here:
> https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2019/10/23/detailed-as_set-analysis.txt 

We seem to have some issues as $dayJob is listed in here.. I’m researching this now.

I was surprised to find some of our routes announced with this, eg:

23.52.172.0/23 2914 20940 20940 {21342}
2600:140b:f000::/48 2914 20940 20940 {21342}
2a02:26f0:e00::/48 2914 6762 20940 20940 {21342}

- Jared
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr