Re: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:16:33 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sue, et al, I support publication. This is a simple extension with implementations and the document is ready to be progressed. Thanks, Acee From: Idr <[email protected]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[email protected]> Date: Monday, November 18, 2019 at 1:49 PM To: IDR List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019 Greetings IDR: ------------------- This is an extension of the WG LC (10/30 to 11/13/2019) to 11/24/2019. This is the second attempt at WG LC that has received little or no comment on IDR. Is the conclusion that this chair should draw is that there is no interest in publishing this draft? Please comment to the list publically or privately to the chairs. Thank you, Susan Hares ------------- This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt. The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point. The current web page leaves some doubt. Cheerily, Susan Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr