Re: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019

Hi,

I support this document.

Best regards,
Jie
发件人：Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>
收件人：Susan Hares <[email protected]>;'idr wg' <[email protected]>
时 间：2019-11-22 07:20:58
主 题：Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019

I support this draft.
It is obviously needed in order to maintain complete support for IGP extensions and it has multiple existing implementations.

The updated V10 (recently published) addresses a number of editorial concerns which were important to resolve. Thanx to the authors for addressing those.

   Les

From: Idr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 9:47 PM
To: 'idr wg' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019

Greetings IDR:
-------------------

This is an extension of the WG LC (10/30 to 11/13/2019) to 11/24/2019.    This is the second attempt at WG LC that has received little or no comment on IDR.

Is the conclusion that this chair should draw is that there is no interest in publishing this draft?  Please comment to the list publically or privately to the chairs.

Thank you,

Susan Hares

-------------


This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt.

The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:

 https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations

The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr