Re: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019

I support the WGLC for this draft.

Linda Dunbar

From: Idr <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 9:47 PM
To: 'idr wg' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019

Greetings IDR:
-------------------

This is an extension of the WG LC (10/30 to 11/13/2019) to 11/24/2019.    This is the second attempt at WG LC that has received little or no comment on IDR.

Is the conclusion that this chair should draw is that there is no interest in publishing this draft?  Please comment to the list publically or privately to the chairs.

Thank you,

Susan Hares

-------------


This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt.

The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:

 https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.ietf.org%2Ftrac%2Fidr%2Fwiki%2Fdraft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%2520implementations&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Cfa4046a9002540e42c6d08d76eee7f1b%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637099842929641916&sdata=ZDOofvLIYJ3WyhXLMIyWvpGMcj7eN2t6uSx48XXTn%2FE%3D&reserved=0>

The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr