Re: [IDMEF] IESG Comment section 3.2.5
"David A. Curry" <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:52:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Herve Debar, identified as "Herve" below, wrote: +> Also, I noticed this: [[ 3.2.5 Enumerated Types +> Enumerated types are represented by the ENUM data type, and consist of an +> ordered list of acceptable values. Each value has a rank (number) and a +> representing keyword. +> Within IDMEF XML messages, the enumerated type keywords are used as +> attribute values, and the ranks are ignored. However, those IDMEF- +> compliant applications that choose to represent these values internally in +> a numeric format MUST use the rank values identified in this memo. ]] +> What right has a spec of this type to tell an application to do +> internally? Herve> Suggestion: drop paragraph. Agreed. I think this is an artifact of the merge of the UML draft (which had an SMI/SNMP flavor) and the XML draft, and probably never should have made it through the merge. --Dave