Re: [IDMEF][Issue 10] Severity scale too narrow
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:52:05 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1075225925.8516.6.camel@arwen> |
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 13:54, Herve Debar wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, David A. Curry wrote: > > > > > >>I am way skeptical of any scheme that purports to assign numerical > >>values to this type of data and claim that they are "accurate" in any > >>meaningful way. > >> > >>As I recall, the group was similarly skeptical when the idea was > >>proposed in the past (and it was proposed more than once). > > I think in similar terms. I'd like to propose an enumerated, textual > list, and let people assign whatever internal numerical values they > want. Maybe this "numerical" value could be provided for as an option, > but the enumerated string would be mandatory. Wouldn't numerical value be a problem for interoperability between products ? -- Yoann Vandoorselaere, http://www.prelude-ids.org "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAFqVF4tfUv0C+vv8RAj4gAJ0aS1FW4t2MeVLog9tw+O2kgnu2uACdHj37 +f5hNk4NymxpHbOoG4fhPH4= =Vkir -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----