impact types too general ?

Hi,

 

In the last draft, we have 6 impact types (admin, dos, file, recon, user,
other).

 

Don't you think 'other' group is too general ?

 

 

It would be great to have more categories like in Snort or Netforensics: 

(I don't know how many ..)

 

For example 

 

- virus, exploit, evasion, monitoring, policy violations could be add

- admin and user type could be join in an
authentication/access/authorization group (and set severity correctly)

 

 

David Maciejak