Document Status & WG Actions

Mike Erlinger <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:31:07 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Everyone

The IESG is in the midst of reviewing our documents.  Stuart and I
have been contacted by our ADs (Jeff and Steve) about some nits and
one significant issue in the Requirements ID and the IDXP ID.

Significant Issue:

The significant issue is "non-repudiation".  Reading RFC 2828 and
paraphrasing some of Jeff and Steve's comments, non-repudiation is
not generally a property of a transport protocol.  It is typically
a property of an object, i.e., you digitally sign an object. To
provide non-repudiation, you need to keep not only the original
object, but also the digital signatures, etc.  Thus, non-repudiation
is not something that we should require of the transport protocol.

Reading the Requirements ID, the ADs have wondered if what we were
after was per-source authentication.  It was a long time ago and
I am not remembering the discussions. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
I propose the following changes:

1.  Drop non-repudiation from the Requirements Doc and
replaced it with per-source authentication (5.6).

2.  Ask the IDXP author to drop non-repudiation from that
    document and produce a new draft.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Requirements ID Nits:

1.  Many sub-sections did not have titles in the ToC.  I have added
titles and believe this is now fixed.

2.  The Security Considerations section did not show up as a numbered
section, and did not specifically say that Section 5 lists the security
requirements for the eventual protocols.  Now fixed


Working Group Actions:

In order to make appropriate dead lines for the IESG, the new drafts
need to be completed by Friday.  The Nits should not be of major
concern (unless I messed up something). But if you have concern about
dropping "non-repudiation" and adding per-source authentication,
you need to quickly raise the issue on the
mailing list.  Silence on the mailing list will indicate agreement with
the changes.



There will be a new version of the Requirements ID with the above 
changes posted this evening.


mike

-- 
Mike Erlinger, Professor and Chair Computer Science
www:      http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~mike
email:    [email protected]
smail:    Computer Science Dept., Harvey Mudd College,
          301 E. 12th Street, Claremont, CA, 91711 
          909-621-8912,   FAX: 909-607-8364