Re: Document Status & WG Actions

John White wrote:
> We had a discussion of this in late June after Glenn pointed out the 
> problem. We were loath to go back and revise the questionable 
> requirement, so the current IDXP draft refers several times to 
> "non-repudiation of session origin."  If we just change those instances 
> to "authentication of session origin" it would seem to meet the revised 
> requirement proposed by Mike.

I agree with John.

Hervé
-- 
Hervé Debar                <mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: +33 (0)2 31 75 92 61               GSM: +33 (0)6 74 09 09 66
France Télécom R&D                      Fax: +33 (0)2 31 75 93 13
42 rue des Coutures  (-/-)  BP 6243  (-/-)   F-14066 Caen Cedex 4