Re: [IDMEF][Issue 8] Classification and ident
Krzysztof Zaraska <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:28:47 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Herve Debar wrote: > Proposal: > > move from > 1..n > Alert------Classification > > to > 1..n 0..n > Alert-------Message--------Classification > > Message has 2 fields > - ident (reference) > - meaning (whatever one wants to put there) > > And classification is reserved for documentation. I mostly agree, however: 1. Isn't "message" confusing with the root object? 2. What's the rationale for using > 1 Classification/documentation fields per vulnerbility id? // Krzysztof Zaraska * kzaraska (at) student.uci.agh.edu.pl // http://mops.uci.agh.edu.pl/~kzaraska/ * http://www.prelude-ids.org/ // A dream will always triumph over reality, once it is given the chance. // -- Stanislaw Lem