Re: correction to DHS ieprep-related comments to the FCC

At 10:05 AM 6/11/2004 -0400, Janet P Gunn wrote:
>For what it is worth, the minimal request "(or, if they cannot prioritize,
>not give
>worse service and not destroy the marking)" was based on historical
>experiences with the circuit switched networks.

but this is still an issue for this WG because if Diffserv is used as the 
priority mechanism, it's stated capability is its ability to be rewritten 
into another DSCP value at any domain edge router (chosen exclusively by 
that domain provider) - which could be interpreted as destroying the 
calling party's signaled priority value...


>Janet


cheers,
James

                                *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented