RE: Meaning of Single Administrative Domain

In the Abstract, I state the following: "This document is an extension of the
General Requirements of [rfc3689] and focuses on a more specific set of
administrative constraints and scope."  

And the Introduction, I state that "we constrain our scenario to the resources
within a single domain".


The intent of the document is to look at the subject of ETS within a single
domain.  It does not mean that ETS == single domain, or that it only operates
within a single domain.

Further, the text in 4.2 is meant to state a correlation between ITU's use of
TDR and IETF's use of ETS.  I thought it would be helpful for readers initial
exposure to both terms.  But again, section 4.2 is not meant to imply that ETS
is applied exclusively to a single domain.

The solution is to either restate in section 4.2 what I said in the
introduction,  or simply rip out 4.2.  If the ITU's position on TDR is fluid,
then I'll favor option 2.

-ken

ps, on a sidenote, I'm on travel to London later today, so I'll be slow in
responding in the next day or so.