RE: Discussion on Charter

At 07:59 AM 02/23/05 -0500, Ken Carlberg wrote:
>Traditionally, the strongest form of persuasion in the IETF is to have an 
>actual draft-RFC from which others can comment on, and in this case, 
>decide whether the document is a reasonable starting point to re-charter a 
>group (or if it should go into another group, remain an individual 
>submission, or simply expire).

Would that be anything like:

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-nested-vpn-routing-00.txt
   "Routing in a Nested VPN", Fred Baker, 14-Feb-05,
   <draft-baker-nested-vpn-routing-00.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-tsvwg-vpn-signaled-preemption-02.txt
   "QoS Signaling in a Nested Virtual Private Network", Fred Baker, 14-Feb-05,
   <draft-baker-tsvwg-vpn-signaled-preemption-02.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chan-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-01.txt
   "Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes", Kwok Ho Chan, 21-Feb-05,
   <draft-chan-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-01.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-05.txt
   "Communications Resource Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol 
(SIP)",
   Henning Schulzrinne, James Polk, 26-Oct-04,
   <draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-05.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption-02.txt
   "Extending the Session Initiation Protocol Reason Header for Preemption
   Events", James Polk, 25-Aug-04,
   <draft-ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption-02.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-service-classes-00.txt
   "Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes", Jozef Babiarz,
   14-Feb-05, <draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-service-classes-00.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlef-concerns-00.txt
   "MLEF Without Capacity Admission Does Not Satisfy MLPP Requirements", Fred
   Baker, James Polk, 9-Feb-05, <draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlef-concerns-00.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works-00.txt
   "Implementing MLPP for Voice and Video in the Internet Protocol Suite", 
Fred
   Baker, James Polk, 8-Feb-05, <draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works-00.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-00.txt
   "A Resource Reservation Extension for the Reduction of Bandwidth of a
   Reservation Flow", James Polk, Subha Dhesikan, 10-Feb-05,
   <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-00.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-dste-02.txt
   "Aggregation of RSVP Reservations over MPLS TE/DS-TE Tunnels", Francois Le
   Faucheur, 14-Feb-05, <draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-dste-02.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-ipsec-00.txt
   "Aggregate RSVP Reservations for IPsec Tunnels", Francois Le Faucheur,
   14-Feb-05, <draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-ipsec-00.txt>

   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-ieprep-flow-model-considerations-01.txt
   "Considerations for IEPREP Related Protocol Packet Flow Models", James 
Polk,
   16-May-03, <draft-polk-ieprep-flow-model-considerations-01.txt>

Plus my mlpp-policy draft whenever I actually complete it.

?