Re: Re-charter?
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:48:03 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ieprep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brief remark: I'm not sure what "sessions" refers to in the snippet below. Is this addressed to the application layer session (say, SIP), a network layer session (RSVP, NSIS) or something else entirely? In general, given the tortuous history of IEPREP discussions, more specificity as to the types of mechanisms and protocols affected would be helpful, in my opinion. Are there existing drafts that will be used as baseline (or input) or this is a from-scratch effort? King, Kimberly S. wrote: > 3. Some countries require civil networks to preempt sessions > under state circumstances, and preemption is considered an > absolute requirement in governmental networks in most > countries. Unless implementation of these requirements can > be objectively shown to threaten network health (via > simulation or in operations), then the requirement needs to > be considered by IEPREP and specific solutions must be > developed. >