Re: Re-charter? [IP911 and preemption]

Jason

At 04:58 PM 7/1/2005 -0400, Jason Michael Canon wrote:
>Sorry, I meant GETS/WPS and MLPP.
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Michael Canon" 
><[email protected]>
>To: "King, Kimberly S." <[email protected]>; "Janet P Gunn" 
><[email protected]>
>Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; 
><[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
>Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 4:54 PM
>Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?
>
>
>I have a generic, high level question.
>
>As a civilian in an emergency situation I call 9-1-1 to report some life
>threatening situation in my
>house.

IEPREP doesn't address 911 calling, ECRIT does - and currently has frowned 
upon the use of prioritizing sessions/flows/calls in its efforts to date.

>While the call is in progress a sufficient number of government
>officials evoke a GETS/WAS
>or MOP capability and my call is effectively preempted or degraded to a
>level that is not tolerable.

As Dennis and others pointed out, currently, there is no preemption on the 
public circuit-switched networks for GETS. I believe the E911 example is 
the reason for the rule of "no preemption" by GETS.

>Thanks,
>Jason


cheers,
James

                                 *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.