RE: Diffserv Code Point for Emergency calls
"Dolly, Martin C, ALABS" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:24:25 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ieprep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <28F05913385EAC43AF019413F674A0170DE0BD25@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com> |
James, There are additional Switch call processing requirements. Cheers, Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf > Of Janet P Gunn > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 5:51 AM > To: James M. Polk > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; ken carlberg > Subject: RE: [Ieprep] Diffserv Code Point for Emergency calls > > > > > > > James, > > The PSTN DOES give emergency (911) calls priority in a small way. > > The SS7 signaling messages have an associated priority, > called MTP. When > an SS7 "server" is congested, it will shed MTP 0 messages > before it sheds > MTP 1 messages. > > Normal call request messages ( ISUP IAMs) are MTP 0. > Emergency (911), NS/EP. and MLPP call request messages are MTP 1. > > Janet > > [email protected] wrote on 10/23/2005 11:42:34 PM: > > > Reinaldo > > > > Actually, the PSTN does not give better priority to 911 > calls (vs. normal > > > calls), they just use separate cirucuits once the 911 call > gets to the > > first Class-5 switch. Typically, a Class-5 Switch will have a small > number > > of dedicated circuits that connect directly to a 911 > Selective Router > > (which is a special instance of a Class-5 switch). 911 > calls are routed > > over these dedicated circuits towards the SR to then be > routed to the > > appropriate PSAP. This isn't really anything special - > since the circuit > > world is not bandwidth contending, they are circuit contending. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ieprep mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep >