ETS (was Re: <draft-lefaucheur-emergency-rsvp> : Preemption scope)

ken carlberg <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:19:29 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tsvwg,gmane.ietf.ieprep
Message-ID <[email protected]>
just to note, the following RFC documents contain text on Emergency  
Telecommunications Service (ETS).

rfc-3487:  Requirements for Resource Priority Mechanisms for the
                   Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
rfc-3689:  General Requirements for
                   Emergency Telecommunication Service (ETS)
rfc-3690:  IP Telephony Requirements for
                   Emergency Telecommunication Service (ETS)
rfc-4190:  Framework for Supporting Emergency Telecommunications
                   Service (ETS) in IP Telephony
rfc-4375:  Emergency Telecommunications Services (ETS) Requirements
                    for a Single Administrative Domain
rfc-4412:  Communications Resource Priority for
                    the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
rfc-4542: Implementing an Emergency Telecommunications Service (ETS) for
                  Real-Time Services in the Internet Protocol Suite

I've cc'ed the IEPREP list since nearly all of the above documents  
came from that group.  I kindly ask that if people choose to continue  
the discussion on ETS, please drop the TSVWG from the cc list and  
continue it on IEPREP.

-ken

On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

> Martin,
>
> Dolly, Martin C, ALABS wrote:                    (Tue, 06 Jun 2006  
> 13:18:47)
>> TDR is the international service, where ETS is a national service  
>> (e.g.,
>> USA)
>
> As a general rule Canada adopts US terminology over International
> terminology in telecommunications, or make ups their own terms.
>
> It is likely do to the proximity and friendly nature of the two
> countries.
>
> --brian
>
> -- 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>