ETS (was Re: <draft-lefaucheur-emergency-rsvp> : Preemption scope)
ken carlberg <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:19:29 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tsvwg,gmane.ietf.ieprep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
just to note, the following RFC documents contain text on Emergency
Telecommunications Service (ETS).
rfc-3487: Requirements for Resource Priority Mechanisms for the
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
rfc-3689: General Requirements for
Emergency Telecommunication Service (ETS)
rfc-3690: IP Telephony Requirements for
Emergency Telecommunication Service (ETS)
rfc-4190: Framework for Supporting Emergency Telecommunications
Service (ETS) in IP Telephony
rfc-4375: Emergency Telecommunications Services (ETS) Requirements
for a Single Administrative Domain
rfc-4412: Communications Resource Priority for
the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
rfc-4542: Implementing an Emergency Telecommunications Service (ETS) for
Real-Time Services in the Internet Protocol Suite
I've cc'ed the IEPREP list since nearly all of the above documents
came from that group. I kindly ask that if people choose to continue
the discussion on ETS, please drop the TSVWG from the cc list and
continue it on IEPREP.
-ken
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Dolly, Martin C, ALABS wrote: (Tue, 06 Jun 2006
> 13:18:47)
>> TDR is the international service, where ETS is a national service
>> (e.g.,
>> USA)
>
> As a general rule Canada adopts US terminology over International
> terminology in telecommunications, or make ups their own terms.
>
> It is likely do to the proximity and friendly nature of the two
> countries.
>
> --brian
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>