Re: Discussion of Internet-Draft for SMTP priorities

At 11:51 PM 6/12/2006, Janet Gunn wrote:

 >Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:07:22 -0400
 >From: Janet P Gunn <[email protected]>
 >
 >Current implementations of  MLPP, eMLPP, WPS, and RPH use 0 to represent
 >the high priority group, with 1.2.3.4, etc representing successively lower
 >priorities.  What is the rationale for turning this upside down and using 0
 >to represent "non-priority"?

The current DISA specification for MLPP on VoIP networks specifies RPH 
r-priority values of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 in ascending order of priority (e.g. 
0 = Routine and 9 = F-O-O).

John Rosenberg