Re: Question about the IEPREP Recharting Proposal

Rechartering is a lot simpler if first document versions are available 
and the group can look at them in order to decide whether it makes sense 
to extend the charter in a particular way.

Ciao
Hannes

ken carlberg wrote:
> Hannes,
> 
> in a nutshell, the intent of the re-charter was to go beyond  
> requirements and in some form consider solutions that do not fall  
> within the charter of other working groups.
> 
> I believe that there are some other interested parties that have been  
> working on drafts that go beyond previous work done by the group, but  
> that they are awaiting the results of the proposed rechartering  
> discussions.  However, others should probably speak up on that matter.
> 
> -ken
> 
> On Jul 28, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I haven't follwed the IEPREP working group too closely in the past.  
>> This week I read through all the documents and I also went through  
>> the rechartering proposal.
>>
>> As an "outsider" I was not quite sure what exactly you would like  
>> todo? (i.e., what should the new documents cover that is not  
>> addressed in previous docs).
>> Do you have some documents that could tell me what you guys plan todo?
>> How do these documents relate to the new charter items?
>>
>> Sorry, if I appear a little bit lost...
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ieprep mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
> 
> 
>