Re: proposed charter 5 priority levels
Janet P Gunn <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ieprep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFBAA95066.05652C8C-ON852571F5.004A9C8A-852571F5.004B6690@csc.com> |
As RFC 4412 makes perfectly clear, the RPH serves a dual role of signalling priority across an IP network (e.g. from an originating circuit switched access network to a terminating circuit switched access network) as well as signalling priority within the IP network. For each of the namespaces described in RFC 4412, the number of priority values (5 in most cases, 6 in one) is driven by the former role, based on the number of priority values in use, or being considered, in the access network priority scheme. The issue of how many priority levels to differentiate WITHIN the IP network is an issue currently being addressed by vendors and providers. Janet Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> wrote on 09/26/2006 01:21:39 AM: > > As long as the number of priority/preemption classes remains too open > ended, the mapping onto DSCP and Diffserv-TE remains uncertain. For > example, there has to be a strong technical justification for five > priority classes, not just "because ITU specified five" before there > is much of a chance for a set of new DSCP values to be assigned as > anything other than experimental. > >