Re: proposed charter

At 06:02 PM 9/26/2006 -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

>In message <[email protected]>
>Fred Baker writes:
> >
> > or whether drop priority even makes sense operationally, which it
> > doesn't.
> >
> > On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> >
> > > For example, it is important
> > > to know how many priority/preemption values there will be and whether
> > > each priority requires three drop preferences as required by an AF
> > > service.
>
>
>Fred,
>
>For PSTN voice it doesn't but for elastic real time or elastic bulk
>transfer it might.  What you are saying is that AF doesn't make sense.

For voice?

>Maybe it doesn't but if so the diffserv WG wasted a lot of time.

Have you looked at who wrote 2597?

>Either that or maybe ETS will never be anything but voice traffic.
>
>Curtis