Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)

Janet P Gunn <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:48:05 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ieprep
Message-ID <OF7DB5BB8C.EB2CAF10-ON8525721A.0077ACC5-8525721A.0077C257@csc.com>






----- Forwarded by Janet P Gunn/FED/CSC on 11/02/2006 04:47 PM -----

ken carlberg <[email protected]> wrote on 11/02/2006 01:58:01 PM:

> Sam,
>
> One of the objectives of the work produced by IEPREP was to lay down
> the ground work and put together a baseline set of requirements to
> start with when considering solutions.=A0 Our intention was that the
> baseline then becomes a starting point where more specific
> requirements can be put forth.=A0 Outside of this, solutions were
> definitely out of scope.
>
> My understanding is that there are others that now wish to present
> some more specific requirements and potential solutions that do not
> fall into the scope of other working groups.=A0 So the proposed re-
> charter looks to be a natural extension to what has been done.
>
> Interestingly enough, the work that you mention below in your
> original posting...
>
> <snip>
> "I would assume we'd ask people working in this space to
> take a look at the existing ieprep output, RFC 4542, RFC 4411,
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signal-preemption and other appropriate
> documents."
>
> ... rfc-4542, rfc-4411, and draft -ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signal-preemption
> (along with some other related work) has actually not been done in
> IEPREP because the group was not allowed to consider solutions.
> Instead, some of the work has been pushed to TSVWG, to the groans
> and sometimes confusion of some of the participants of that group,
> who wondered what the subject of prioritization had to do with
> TSVWG.=A0 Part of the revised charter is meant to remove this obstacl=
e.
>
> Also, as Scott Brimm has mentioned, there is a proposed liaison from
> the ITU to work with the IETF, with one of the working groups of
> interest being IEPREP.=A0 It would seem odd to close down the group
> and punt the subject to them when they are approaching "us" for
> assistance=A0 If IEPREP is closed, does that mean the subject gets
> pushed over to TSVWG?
>
> -ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf=