Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
Janet P Gunn <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:48:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ieprep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF7DB5BB8C.EB2CAF10-ON8525721A.0077ACC5-8525721A.0077C257@csc.com> |
----- Forwarded by Janet P Gunn/FED/CSC on 11/02/2006 04:47 PM ----- ken carlberg <[email protected]> wrote on 11/02/2006 01:58:01 PM: > Sam, > > One of the objectives of the work produced by IEPREP was to lay down > the ground work and put together a baseline set of requirements to > start with when considering solutions.=A0 Our intention was that the > baseline then becomes a starting point where more specific > requirements can be put forth.=A0 Outside of this, solutions were > definitely out of scope. > > My understanding is that there are others that now wish to present > some more specific requirements and potential solutions that do not > fall into the scope of other working groups.=A0 So the proposed re- > charter looks to be a natural extension to what has been done. > > Interestingly enough, the work that you mention below in your > original posting... > > <snip> > "I would assume we'd ask people working in this space to > take a look at the existing ieprep output, RFC 4542, RFC 4411, > draft-ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signal-preemption and other appropriate > documents." > > ... rfc-4542, rfc-4411, and draft -ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signal-preemption > (along with some other related work) has actually not been done in > IEPREP because the group was not allowed to consider solutions. > Instead, some of the work has been pushed to TSVWG, to the groans > and sometimes confusion of some of the participants of that group, > who wondered what the subject of prioritization had to do with > TSVWG.=A0 Part of the revised charter is meant to remove this obstacl= e. > > Also, as Scott Brimm has mentioned, there is a proposed liaison from > the ITU to work with the IETF, with one of the working groups of > interest being IEPREP.=A0 It would seem odd to close down the group > and punt the subject to them when they are approaching "us" for > assistance=A0 If IEPREP is closed, does that mean the subject gets > pushed over to TSVWG? > > -ken > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf=