Re: on the ieprep recharter

The deadline for BOF submissions for Prague is Jan 15th.  Is that
reasonable to aim for, or is Chicago a better choice?

Janet


"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> wrote on 12/18/2006 08:30:03 AM:

>
> To the IEPREP WG,
>
> After considerable deliberation within the IESG, I am sorry to
> report that the IESG is not comfortable approving the IEPREP charter
> as it stands.
>
> In particular, the IESG is concerned about a perceived lack of focus
> in the deliverables, and collectively feels that it is difficult to
> assess the support of the community for this charter. Some of the
> open-endedness in the charter about non-real-time communications has
> given rise to questions about the diverse expertise required to
> complete the work. Concerns about whether or not the IETF is the
> proper venue for this work continue to be expressed within the IESG as
well.
>
> At this time, the rough consensus in the IESG is that in order for
> the charter to progress, the community would have to affirm its
> support for the work in the context of a BoF. The IESG is willing to
> participate in honing the charter for such a BoF if this is the
> direction you'd like to take it.
>
> I am sorry after such a long time to be returning with another
> negative response. I do believe that the response reflects an
> informed consensus of the IESG.
>
> Jon Peterson
> NeuStar, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep