(unknown)
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:13:58 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imap-voice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Subject: Re: draft-nerenberg-imap-binary-00.txt
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:46:09 MST."
<[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
--------
> To the best of my knowledge Lyndon will be writing another draft (superset of the
> current) that will address VPIM stuff (general ability to transform/deliver message
> in a different format or over a different channel).
No. The intent was to explicitly address only the content-transfer-encoding
issue. General conversion of body content is a large can of fish bait that
I'm not going to go anywhere near.
I think channel is very useful, but it's a separate issue from that
which BINARY addresses.
--lyndon