Re: client support for RFC 3516 (BINARY) ?

Jan Kundrát <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imapext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 02:15:24 CEST, Jamie Nicolson (倪志明) wrote:
> Are people typically restricting the use of
> BINARY to terminal parts, or are they issuing things like FETCH BINARY[] ?

In case of Trojita, we don't request a BINARY on a non-leaf part because I 
don't think doing that should be "legal". As I originally said in that 
e-mail thread, this is probably worth an errata update to the RFC, IMHO.

With kind regards,
Jan

-- 
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.