Re: client support for RFC 3516 (BINARY)?
Dave Cridland <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKHUCzyM00ZVUA1SkZFsSU5FWYdm1NSRokVad--jiKDcm4b7Ng@mail.gmail.com> |
On 9 Dec 2014 23:54, "Lyndon Nerenberg" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, 3516 was supposed to restrict binary fetches to terminal MIME parts. I was sure the final version of the draft had that text, and it still baffles me how it got through last call without me noticing, but there you go. The RFC does seem to be written entirely with leaf nodes in mind, though it never actually makes the restriction. On the basis that all implementations reject noon leaf sections anyway, making it an errata seems the most pragmatic solution, whatever the process says. Dave. _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext