Re: [IMAP] APPEND Command Usage
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/12/2014 17:19, Jamie Nicolson (倪志明) wrote: > For servers that have a single APPENDLIMIT across all mailboxes, it's > easier (and saves bandwidth) to not have to specify any per-mailbox > APPENDLIMIT in the SELECT response. In this case the APPENDLIMIT > specified in the CAPABILITY should hold across all mailboxes. I think > this is the intent, but the only direct statement about this I see in > the document is for the APPENDLIMIT response code to SELECT in section > 3.1: "If this is missing, the client can always honour the value > received as part of CAPABILITY response." I'd like this to be a little > more firm, so that the server can choose to omit the per-mailbox > APPENDLIMIT and know that the client will respect the common limit. > > Perhaps you could state this directly in the introduction to section > 3, something like, "If no per-mailbox APPENDLIMIT is specified for a > folder, but the server did specify a common APPENDLIMIT in the > CAPABILITY response, then the common APPENDLIMIT applies to that folder." +1. _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext