Re: The IMAP APPENDLIMIT Extension
Cyrus Daboo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jan, --On January 4, 2015 at 12:25:30 AM +0100 Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> wrote: >> Surely it would be very valuable to include in this extension a >> means for a server to indicate that it does not accept APPENDs >> at all. > > That's IMHO what the ACL extension is for -- the "i" right defined in > RFC4314. > Tru,e but I think we need to distinguish between what is "allowed" (ACL) vs what the size limit is (APPENDLIMIT). As others have noted, the limit may well reach zero because of some quota on the mailbox. I don't think that the ACL should depend on the the available quota in that case (i.e., the "i" right would remain set because if messages were deleted, APPENDs would be OK). So I think APPENDLIMIT=0 should be a valid response (though I think Pete's example of a "read-only" email archive would be better served via removing the "i" ACL right). -- Cyrus Daboo _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext