Re: The IMAP APPENDLIMIT Extension

Michael M Slusarz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imapext
Message-ID <20150218132315.Horde.-nUqH4le7mjpRGNjkpWaZg6@bigworm.curecanti.org>
Quoting Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>:

>> But APPEND is also allowed to be called from within a mailbox.  And  
>> if that current selected context is read-only via EXAMINE, my  
>> understanding/belief is that an APPEND cannot be successful since  
>> that would be an action that causes a "change[] to the permanent  
>> state of the mailbox".
>
> This is only talking about changes to flags/per-message state,  
> EXAMINE was not suppose to prevent message injections and APPENDs.

You are probably correct that this was what EXAMINE was supposed to  
mean.  But it isn't clear at all from any of the text in 3501 that  
this is the case (at least to me).  Probably user error on my part,  
but the documents seem to at least plausibly support my clueless  
position.

More concerning is that the ACL RFC explicitly ties APPEND rights in a  
mailbox to a READ-ONLY response, at least for SELECT commands.  So  
"READ-ONLY" arguably has a different meaning whether you are in a  
mailbox opened by SELECT or by EXAMINE, which is different from any  
other IMAP command I can think of in that you need to know the  
selection context of the current state in order to understand the  
meaning.

michael

___________________________________
Michael Slusarz [[email protected]]

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.